(b) cancelling any paid-up capital which has been lost through trading or is unrepresented by the current assets. This effectively brings the statement of financial position into balance at a lower level by reducing the capital liabilities in recognition of a loss of assets.

　　(c) repayment to members of some part of the paid up value of their shares in excess of the company*s requirements. This means that the company actually returns some of its capital to its members on the basis that it does not actually need that level of capitalisation to carry on its business.

　　It can be seen that procedure (a) reduces the potential creditor fund， for the company gives up the right to make future calls against its shares and procedure (c) reduces the actual creditor fund by returning some of its capital to the members. In recognition of this fact， creditors are given the right to object to any such reduction. However， procedure (b) does not actually reduce the creditor fund， it merely recognises the fact that capital has been lost. Consequently creditors are not given the right to object to this type of alteration (ss.645 & 646)。

　　Under s.648 the court may make an order confirming the reduction of capital on such terms as it as it thinks fit. In reaching its decision the court is required to consider the position of creditors of the company in cases (a) and (c) above and may do so in any other case. The court also takes into account the interests of the general public. In any case the court has a general discretion as to what should be done. If the company has more than one class of shares， the court will also consider whether the reduction is fair between classes. In this it will have regard to the rights of the different classes in a liquidation of the company since a reduction of capital is by its nature similar to a partial liquidation.

　　When a copy of the court order together with a statement of capital is delivered to the registrar of companies a certificate of registration is issued (s.649)。